FACILITATOR KEY. KEEP SEPARATE UNTIL OBSERVATIONS ARE RECORDED.
01: Proposed CASE-ALPHA/2025 based on ALPHA-17 and body period. No authenticity conclusion.
02: Proposed CASE-BRAVO/2025. Matching display name/amount does not justify ALPHA.
03: ALPHA prior-period context, not current2025 evidence. Filename conflicts with body. Practitioner decides permitted historical use.
04: CASE-CHARLIE/2025 business entity. Individual-file association is unsupported under the stated rule. No tax treatment or ownership conclusion.
05: Appropriate hold/clarification. Do not invent the unreadable reference from name or amount. Name next owner and question.
06: Proposed ALPHA/2025 correction to01. Record earlier/later relationship and responsible reviewer. Correct extraction does not establish that a dependent review was reconsidered or a question closed.
Expected handling is not an observed result. None of these cases has been run. Record disagreements with the illustrative rule rather than silently changing it. A second authorized reviewer gets only permitted sources and the recorded handoff, without an oral answer. Separate wrong associations from appropriate holds. Record preparer and reviewer effort separately; waiting time is not staff savings. No statistical accuracy, leakage prevention, identity certification, tax correctness or integration claim follows from six fictional cards.